This article is rated by the Films project as B-class. Can anyone offer a citation for the Gable-McDaniel allegation? - Walloon 08:53, (UTC) V0.5 nomination The accounts I have seen say that he did not like to attend premieres in general, and he became even more dubious about attending when he heard that his friend director Victor Fleming was also boycotting the premiere due to differences Fleming was having with producer Selznick. I've read numerous books on the making of this movie, and have never seen the claim that Clark Gable was threatening to boycott the Atlanta premiere because Hattie McDaniel was not invited. Ogioh ( talk) 04:23, 24 December 2008 (UTC) McDaniel and Gable Just say this statemnt was incuded at the beginning of the film when released on DVD. He wanted to put the "um" leave 'em alone.lol Should anyone desire to see the quote back in I recommend making a quotes section. I have removed it as it didn't belong at the top of the article. The above quote was at the beginning of the article, placed there by an anonymous editor. Look for it only in books, for it is no more than a dream remembered. Here was the last ever to be seen of Knights and their Ladies Fair, of Master and of Slave. Here in this pretty world Gallantry took its last bow. There was a land of Cavaliers and Cotton Fields called the Old South. Just because Evil Deep Blue wanted to.ITS OK!!!!!- nena_linda 6:44 AM, 31 October 2007 -Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.120.137.146 ( talk) 10:44, 31 October 2007 (UTC) Removed quote from beginning Um, should we have a plot summery? Evil Deep Blue 02:27, 13 March 2006 (UTC) Why the "um"? - Walloon 06:22, 13 March 2006 (UTC) The Singing Badger 22:13, 11 March 2006 (UTC) Can someone do a similar table job on the Titanic page? I really hate how they all bgrag about 11 Oscars when I'm sure several of those were technical awards which here seem to be considered a lesser award. See the list of Oscars at the bottom of the article. I think it's because it won 10 but two of them were 'special' one-off awards for which no other film was even nominated. The cover of the dvd claims the film won 10 academy awards.
#ASPEC RATIO GONE WITH THE WIND BLURAY PLUS#
The 8 plus academy award reciever page article claims that the film won 9 academy awards.
#ASPEC RATIO GONE WITH THE WIND BLURAY MOVIE#
This articles claims that this movie won 8 academy awards. Walloon 21:28, 15 February 2006 (UTC)Īnd into the bargain, might one perhaps request some variety of plot summary? - The preceding unsigned comment was added by 68.97.17.122 ( talk Trekphiler 14:39, 15 December 2005 (UTC) Apparently Margaret Mitchell's joke went right over your head. For instance (hard as it may be to believe), Margaret Mitchell's first choice was Groucho Marx. OK, now that we've established every woman in Hollywood tested for it (though Selznik had already chosen Viv Leigh), can we mention the role of Rhett? Beyond "I don't give a damn", I mean. How come this article says that Scarlett was met with mixed reviews while the Scarlett article says it was universally panned? Ken Arromdee 08:24, 18 November 2005 (UTC) Casting Call Walloon 00:22, 5 November 2005 (UTC) Inconsistency However, ki was informed of the Selznick interest, sworn to secrecy and told that a screen test was not presently necessary since David Selznick could view her previous films instead. Selznick began negotiations with Alexander Korda to secure her services for a commitment later that year and found the overseas movie man was not immediately receptive to the idea. But his most guarded correspondence later showed that from February on Vivien Leigh had the inside track to play Scarlett O'Hara. His confidential correspondence of that time included a thank-you to M-G-M for the print of Miss Leigh's film and discussions with Myron Selznick asking that his client, Laurence Olivier, postpone divorce proceedings until after Gone with the Wind began. These effects yielded a privately owned print of A Yank at Oxford, rental receipts for all of Miss Leigh's British films and various photographs of her - all date-stamped between February and August of 1938. It wouldn't be, actually, until after death twenty-seven years later that his personal effects would uncover a masterful public deception. William Pratt wrote in his book Scarlett Fever,